“The Eve of Destruction” Biden’s Immigration Policy

 Don't you understand, what I'm trying to say?

Can't you feel the fears that I'm feeling today?

Take a look around you, boy, it's bound to scare you, boy

And you tell me over and over and over again my friend

Ah, you don't believe we're on the eve of destruction

 

Bob Dylan / P.F. Sloan 

Eve Of Destruction (1965)

It has taken a while for America’s oblivious Main Stream Media (MSM) to begin to comprehend that bringing in millions of undocumented aliens to boost the Democratic voter roles may not be as great an idea as once thought when it also brings in communicable diseases. 

The Biden Administration is running Obama’s playbook for the destruction of a free America. One ruled not by laws but by tyrants; both the bureaucratic and judicial types. 

Opening up the southern border to communicable diseases, Mexican Drug Cartels, and Islamic Jihadists hasn’t deterred the Biden Administration and Democratic members of Congress. So now Mr. Biden permits and dare I say encourages, the introduction of communicable diseases, to the United States and the North American Continent without deterrence.

The CDC, it should be noted, was originally an agency within the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS). The USPHS was founded in 1798. Its earliest mission was the care of sick and disabled seamen in USPHS-established hospitals. But more significantly to the matter at hand, in 1878, the USPHS mission was expanded to take on control of infectious diseases, including quarantine, which previously had been a state function. As immigration increased, in the late 19th century, the USPHS took on the responsibility.

Yet today, millions of illegal immigrants cross our borders without even a cursory examination of their medical condition. I guess the Biden Administration did not get the memo on who is responsible in this county to evaluate and if necessary quarantine and deny admission to an individual for communicable diseases. That was not meant as a joke.

Finally, we are lectured that the American public should be compassionate with these people who only want to improve their lives for themselves and their children. Well, we have we heard that “compassion” thing a lot these past 3 years. Nevertheless, why has the Biden Administration turned a blind eye to U.S. Code, Section 34.3 of 42 CFR Part 34[1]? Should not Mr. Biden be concerned that thousands of illegal immigrants are coming across our borders with infectious diseases such as drug-resistant tuberculosis; COVID-19; hepatitis A and B; sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) - gonorrhea, syphilis, herpes, trichomoniasis, chlamydia; mumps; chickenpox; dengue fever; etc. 

However, these diseases are not just confined to border states, as illegal aliens are systematically dispersed across the nation, it becomes a potentially perilous danger for the entire nation. 

Still, the Powers To Be tells us not to worry. The United States Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control (CDC), National Institute of Health (NIH), The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); et al, will be there to ensure our safety. Never mind that just in the recent past, the NIH, CDC, and NIAID: 

1. Mishandled live anthrax;

2. Misplaced live smallpox;

3. Mislabeled influenza virus that had been cross-contaminated 

  with the highly deadly H5NI strain of bird flu.

4. Destroyed America’s confidence in its ability to fight infectious diseases in its handling of the COVID-19 virus.

5. Destroyed America’s confidence in effective vaccines.

If you think this is the worst that can happen - think again. Throughout history, mankind has been devastated by a pathogen commonly referred to as the “Plague." Infected with the pathogen Yersinia pestis, a disease vector will transmit to another living organism (people), and once infected, humans will transfer the disease to other humans. For example, in Simon Sebag Montefiore’s history, The World, he notes that “the plague had killed 30,000 people in the first year of James I’s reign (1603 to 1625), and 40,000 in 1625, ... then kllled 100,000 Britons out of a population of 5.2 million in the summer of 1665.” Another example in Montefiore’s history is that “in 1720, the plague’s last European wave killed 90,000 out of 150,000 people in Marseilles.” 

However, it should be noted that, today you can bypass the vector and create the bacilli and virus in a lab.[2]

These examples are left to history, however, there is always history yet to be written. We can take nothing for granted. Our government has a duty to protect the American people from all enemies, including the threat to literally the health of our Nation. 

The pandemic potential of this moronic and inept decision to allow unfettered illegal immigration into our country by the Biden Administration should alarm any rational person. And who stands between a catastrophic pandemic and us? Indeed, a politically correct DEI Dr. Rachel Levine, aka Richard Levine, the Assistant Secretary for Health at the US Department of Health and Human Services, the first openly transgender four-star officer across the nation’s eight uniformed services; the NIH; the NIAID; the CDC; and the Biden Administration. 

The salient question is this. Can a nation survive the pathological and pathetic leadership we have today in the United States? The question is rhetorical. No. Not unless there is a change in government.

[1] This provision provides specific screening and testing requirements for diseases that meet the definition of a communicable disease of public health significance.

[2] COVID-19: Made In China https://thegreygrater.blogspot.com/2021/05/covid-19-made-in-china.html

The Tucker Carlson / Putin Interview

 

Well, I heard Mr. Wallace talk about him

Well, I heard ol’ Chris put him down

Well, I hope Chris Wallace will remember

A real American don’t need him around anyhow [1]

 

Chris Wallace, the journalistic legacy tosser, was not impressed with Tucker Carlson’s interview with the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, "The Vladimir Putin Interview," a television interview, that premiered on February 8, 2024, on the Tucker Carlson Network and the social media website X (Twitter). 

 

The Legacy sarcastically opined that it was a “softball interview”, and worse, called Mr. Carlson a “useful idiot.” The latter is a phrase used by and often attributed to Joseph Stalin [2] to describe non-communists (liberals and progressives in the parlance of our day) regarded as susceptible to communist propaganda and psychological manipulation. Mr. Wallace was particularly critical of Mr. Carlson for not pressing Mr. Putin on why he (Russia) invaded Ukraine, a sovereign country. [3] However, Mr. Wallace did not disclose why he did not vigorously pressure then-President William Clinton and his Secretary of State Madeleine  Albright, in 1999, when the United States of America (officially NATO) invaded Serbia, also a sovereign country. [4]

 

In my view, Mr. Carlson’s interview with the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, was a service to America and the free world. Regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the interview’s form and substance, it was a fact that for over two hours, the international free world had an opportunity to understand Russia’s point of view on the war in Ukraine. 

 

Recently, I read 1476 pages of Michael T. Florinsky's brilliant history, Russia: A History and An Interpretation, Volumes I & II. As a student in the 1960s at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, his work was the text for my two semesters of Russian history. Professor (Columbia University) Florinsky's Russian history is an outstanding achievement that in my opinion is unparalleled. The depth of his understanding of Russian history is judicious and eminently insightful. If you wish to understand Russia and Putin today, you need to read these books.

 

Accordingly, I was able to listen to this interview with, I believe, a measure of clarity not common to most listeners, which certainly would include Mr. Wallace. Mr. Putin’s account of Russian history was in my view factual. 

 

It should not be doubted that Russia’s history is the sine qua non of Mr. Putin’s rationale for his policy decisions regarding Ukraine. And, if you want to end this war, you damn well better know why it started.

The Bolshevik Brest - Litovsk Peace Treaty of March 3, 1918, with the Central powers, [5] deprived Russia of her Polish, Baltic (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania), and Belorussian provinces. Moreover, Russia also had to recognize the independence of Ukraine and Finland. It was also understood that granting Ukraine independence in 1918 meant the immediate invasion by Austro-German troops following Russian troop removal from Ukrainian territory. However, Ukraine's bid for independence at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 was rejected, which led to the incorporation of Ukraine into the Soviet Union. 

 

Subsequently, World War II (WWII) led to Nazi Germany's invasion and occupation of the Ukraine in July 1941, as part of the German invasion of the USSR. [6] This lasted until Spring 1944 when the Red Army began to penetrate into Galicia, and by the end of October, all of Ukraine was again under Soviet control. After WWII, the Potsdam Agreement, in August 1945, [7] and the Paris Peace Treaties signed on February 10, 1947, [8] formally recognized Soviet control over the recovered territories. In 1945 Ukraine, became a Soviet quasi-state, and a charter member of the United Nations. However, Ukraine was one of the constituent republics of the Soviet Union from 1922 until 1991 and was governed by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union through, the Communist Party of Ukraine. Independence for the Ukraine was finally realized on August 24, 1991.

 

The pathological silence of Russian policy deliberations has always made it difficult to discern Russian intentions. However, when complete understanding is not knowable, it does not preclude or prohibit educated estimations, which then serve to craft intelligent policy decisions and the basis for a peace negotiation. I would proffer that Mr. Putin’s invasion of the Ukraine was taken by his perceived assessment of President Biden’s commitment to the Ukraine. [9] Meaning, that he (Russia) would not be challenged militarily by the United States or NATO. [10]

 

If Kyiv is to have peace, it will only result in a clear-headed appraisal and realistic assessment of the situ. Peace, I would proffer, is not a choice between status quo ante bellum, and the total annexation of the Ukraine by Russia, but rather something in between. Although a final solution may be onerous, the alternative may be catastrophic. The continued casus belli serves no one, except war profiteers. 

At present, the United States and its European allies seem perfectly prepared to carry on with the destruction of Ukraine, at the expense of Ukrainian and Russian lives, even though the legitimate interests of the combatants are a peaceful solution. Peace should not be sacrificed to political ambition and corruption, who at the moment seemed determined to fight this war to the last drop of blood. [11]

 1. To paraphrase Lynyrd Skynyrd’s song “Sweet Home Alabama,” recorded in June 1973, by songwriters: Ronnie Van Zant, Gary Robert Rossington, and Edward C. King.

 2. Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, was leader of the Soviet Union from 1924 until he died in 1953.

 3. Mr. Wallace’s lament, it is believed, refers to Russia’s most recent incursion in February 2022. Yet there was an earlier incursion in 2014 that resulted in the Russian annexation of the Crimea and Donbas region of Ukraine.

 4. NATO's 1999 military campaign against Serbia (Kosovo). The Americans and Europeans via NATO made a political decision backed by its military might at the time. The U.N. Resolution 1244 negotiated to end the war, and guaranteed Serbian interests and sovereignty in Kosovo. Yet, in February 2008, then US President George W Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, supported the Albanian Kosovars' declaration of Independence from Serbia -- a clear violation of international law, a UN Resolution, and the principle of national sovereignty forged out of the horror of World War II. Moreover, the crisis in Georgia (2008) was a direct result of American and European actions in Kosovo (Serbia). 

5. The Central powers in World War I (WWI), included Germany, Austria, Italy, and Turkey. Bulgaria also joined the Central Powers late in the war, however, although it was too late in the war little attention should be given.

6. AKA Operation Barbarossa, the Axis invasion of the Soviet Union.

7. The Agreement among three of the Allies of WWII: the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union.

8. Paris Peace Treaties, (1947) series of treaties between the Allied powers and five defeated European countries that had been aligned with Germany and the Axis powers during World War II, specifically Italy, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, and Finland.

9. Vienna 1961 Redux: The Putin / Biden 2021 Geneva Summit http://thegreygrater.blogspot.com/2021/06/vienna-1961-redux-putin-biden-2021

10. There should be little doubt that the United States “is” NATO.

11. Baron Manfred von Richthofen; the full quote is, “Fight on and fly on to the last drop of blood and the last drop of fuel, to the last beat of the heart.” 

Palestinian Atrocities

On Friday, Caroline B. Glick, the exceptional senior contributing editor of the Jewish News Syndicate (https://www.jns.org/hamass-deception-and-our-self-deception/) astutely wrote:

"But Saturday’s slaughter made clear—and not for the first or the hundredth time—that this isn’t a political conflict. It is an existential one. And it isn’t only between Israel and Hamas. It is between the vast majority of the Palestinian people, and the entirety of the Palestinian leadership, who actively seek Israel’s physical annihilation and the genocide of world Jewry, and the Jews, who seek to live in peace and freedom in the Jewish State of Israel."

The salient point that must be understood is that this is not simply terrorism (Hamas, Palestinian Authority, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, et.al.) but state-sponsored terrorism (Iran, Qatar, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, et.al.). Look at the scatological protests in the US, Europe, Australia, and the Middle East supporting the attack on Israel and the killing of innocents. Americans, especially American Jewry must understand that Biden and Obama and their Administrations by supporting these state and terrorist entities are also enemies of the United States. 

The world today is precariously endangered. William J. Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack H. Obama, and Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. have been American presidents. Their State Departments and National Security teams have been, by in large, incompetent and pathologically stupid. We’ve had a Christopher, an Albright, a Powell, a Rice, a Clinton, a Kerry, and an Antony John Blinken. That begs the question, who has been educating these people, at Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Georgetown, Columbia, Dartmouth, and Denver University?

The misfeasance of the past 31 years of American Diplomacy, minus the Trump Years, has been an embarrassment. But more importantly, the tumult and upheaval that sweep the world brings death and destruction to the innocent.  Their records of failures are not individual acts of misjudgment but repeated acts of institutional incompetence that manifest themselves in indefensible ignorance. In other words, realpolitik surrenders to the capriciousness of individual hubris. The consequences of limiting your circle of advisers to a small, relatively inexperienced coterie, with no creditable foreign policy experience, and a dubious record for wisdom, can prove disastrous. Again, who has been educating these people, at Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Georgetown, Columbia, Dartmouth, and Denver University? 

The brilliant historian Rebecca West proffered when writing about the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria in Sarajevo on June 14, 1914, that it defied understanding. Speaking about the Archdukes' visit to Bosnia, she wrote, "To pay that visit was an act so suicidal that one fumbles the pages of the history books to find if there is not some explanation of his going ..." The Archduke's assassination is viewed by many as the "spark" that ignited WWI. However, the truth is that Austrian Foreign Minister Leopold Berthold and Austrian Chief of the General Staff Franz Graf Conrad von Hötzendorf were together the true instigators of WWI, along with Germany's Chief of the General Staff Helmuth von Moltke, who strong-armed the Austrian's Emperor Franz Joseph I and Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm II,  respectively, to approve the Schlieffen Plan (in which Germany would stage an attack on France by marching west through the neutral territory of the Netherlands and Belgium), thus igniting histories most catastrophic war. 

The aforementioned portrayal of the events that precipitated WWI is proffered so as to fully appreciate the precarious nature of the global political order. These men were prepared to sacrifice world order to their interests of playing war games to settle old scores. Unlike WWII where events clearly forecasted the coming catastrophe, the First World War began almost as a lark that was forecast to be over in months, but certainly not the beginning of the nightmare it became. The insightful illocution of the brilliant poet Robert Burns says it well: 

            I'm truly sorry man's dominion

         Has broken Nature's social union,

         The best-laid schemes o' mice an' men,

                        Gang aft a-gley,

Now, what are we to make of the world today? There is no question that 'time marches on -- time waits for no man'. However, when and how it marches is not always in a straight line and with a precise timetable. Will there be WWIII or the Second American Civil War? What spark will ignite the world today?  What black swan will arise? The prediction of future events is work for an augur, not an analyst. However, today more than ever, we need an American Foreign Policy that understands the deadly seriousness the world has become, that the defense of the American people, the welfare of our troops, and the free world cannot be predicated on social justice and politically correct baloney.

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it," Albert Einstein

Vienna 1961 Redux: The Putin / Biden 2021 Geneva Summit

You don’t need a crystal ball to predict the consequences of the scandal over U.S. spying on European governments will have on the G7 summit in England, June 11-13 (2021). It will have little. However, it will cast a giant shadow over the critical meeting between Russian President Vladimir V. Putin, and United States President Joseph R. Biden Jr., in Geneva Switzerland, June 16th. This massive scandal, regardless how the mass media wishes to portray it, has shredded the US’s playbook for the summit.

 

The White House, and some Democratic members of Congress, as well as anti-Russian European lawmakers, were huffing and puffing that Biden would reproach Putin over allegations of the Kremlin’s malign conduct. Those allegations include Russian intelligence agencies and hackers interfering in Western democracies. How terribly ironic! For people willing to see the truth, this disclosure now, is a powerful self-indicting and hypocritical revelation of American and European elitists actual malign conduct.

The face to face summit was intended to demonstrate Mr. Biden as a world leader, which could set the stage for US / Russian superpower relationship for his presidency, and further the Russian / Chinese divide. Now, Mr. Putin can hardly believe his good fortunate. Yet, when dealing with US Presidents, except Donald Trump, he has always made out well. The general opinion in Russia is that recent liberal Democratic Presidents such as Carter (Iran), Clinton (Kosovo), Obama (Ukraine), and establishment Republicans such as Bush (Georgia), are, in the parlance of our time, “weak sisters.”

For Mr. Putin, the summit provides an opportunity to size up, or probably confirm his opinion of Mr. Biden, as then Nikita Khrushchev, First Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, did in Vienna, Austria, June 3 - 4, 1961*, in his meeting with US President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. Mr. Khrushchev was concerned how Mr. Kennedy would react to Soviet interests in Berlin — meaning the recognition of East Germany as an independent state. Mr. Putin primary concern is how Mr. Biden will react to further Russian incursion in the Ukraine. 

The Geneva Summit is yet to happen. However, it would be irresponsible not to predict what results from this summit. 

Mr. Biden is in over his head. Mr. Putin’s view of Mr. Biden is that he is weak mentally and physically. That his election to President was illegitimate. That his diplomatic record is uneventful. That his political life is spectacularly inept and corrupt. 

Ukrainian unification is not a practical possibility, and I would posit, even the Ukrainians do not want to pay the price to get it back (the annexation of Crimea and the eastern region known as Donbas). So, Mr. Putin will tell Mr. Biden that Russian annexation is the actual state of affairs. Russia will never agree to give up land it has won in the Ukraine. Mr. Biden will reply, as Mr. Kennedy had done in Berlin: 'that Russia can do what it wants to with what is yours, but do not touch what is ours' (meaning the rest of Ukraine). 

However, Mr. Putin will act in accordance with his perceived assessment of Mr. Biden’s commitment to the Ukraine. In my view, this does not augur well for the Ukraine. The summit will confirm Mr. Putin’s impression of Mr. Biden that he can be easily outmaneuver, and therefore Mr. Putin can act more aggressively in his dealings with the United States, and that there would be little price to pay for future engagements.

Thus, given this plausible scenario, it begs the question — does anyone in the Biden Administration read anything but Critical Race Theory (CRT) and/or John Rawls, A Theory of Justice? 

It’s a rhetorical question people!

*For an outstanding history of the Vienna Summit and its crucial consequences, read Frederick Kempe, “Berlin 1961: Kennedy, Khrushchev, And The Most Dangerous Place On Earth,” New York, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 2011. 

COVID-19: Made In China

 

"All truth passes through three stages. 

First, it is ridiculed. 

Second, it is violently opposed. 

Third, it is accepted as being self-evident”

 Arthur Schopenhauer

 

On May 26, 2021, the U.S. Senate unanimously passed a bill, S. 1867, that would require an unclassified report be provided to Congress, regarding the origin of the SARS-CoV-2, aka COVID-19 virus.

As of now, Mr. Biden claims that there still is not enough evidence to determine “whether it (COVID-19) emerged from human  contact (the official Chinese government theory) with an infected animal or from a laboratory accident.”

In March 2020, the official United States government explanation was published by the National Institutes of Health’s  (NIH) article, “The proximal origin of SARS CoV-2, Kristian G. Andersen, et al. concluded “Although the evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 is not a purposefully manipulated virus, it is currently impossible to prove or disprove the other theories of its origin described here. However, since we observed all notable SARS-CoV-2 features, including the optimized RBD and polybasic cleavage site, in related coronaviruses in nature, we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible."

To date, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) still does not find plausible evidence to refute a natural origin for COVID-19. On May 5th, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director, of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, stated in an interview with National Geographic, that "If you look at the evolution of the virus in bats, and what's out there now is very, very strongly leaning toward this [virus] could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated-the way the mutations have naturally evolved. A number of very qualified evolutionary biologists have said that everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that it evolved in nature and then jumped species."

Yet, on May 23rd, Dr. Fauci, stated “that he is “not convinced” COVID-19 developed naturally and called for further investigation into the virus’s origins after the lab-leak theory had been dismissed by many as a right-wing conspiracy theory for months” (National Review, May 23, 2021). Dr. Fauci behavior borders on schizophrenia. 

However, rational-minded people remain skeptical that COVID-19 is natural and animal-based. US Senator Tom Cotton, had this to say on Fox’s Marie Bartiromo, Sunday Morning Futures: “evidence that came out in the final days of the Trump administration, that some employees and staff at these labs may have had coronavirus-like symptoms as early as October or September of 2019, continues to point to these labs as the origin of this virus, not that food market that the Chinese Communist Party used as a cover story from the very beginning.” 

As of now, there is still no overwhelming consensus on COVID-19’s origin, mostly depending on the old policy adage, “where you stand, depends on where you sit.”

There have been multiple epidemiological studies that enhance our understanding of COVID-19’s origin. One focus was simply tracking the emergence of COVID-19. There is no evidence of an increase in pneumonia-like illness, all-cause mortality, or even purchase of medications to treat fever or respiratory symptoms prior to the emergence of illness in Wuhan in late 2019. The increase in hospitalizations and deaths started to rise in Wuhan in January 2020, and then later outside Wuhan but within Hubei Province. So the evidence does support the emergence of COVID-19 in and around Wuhan. Further, an extensive review of hospital records did not find any likely cases of COVID-19 in October or November 2019 in Wuhan, so it was likely not circulating prior to its emergence in December. 

Therefore. the data overwhelmingly supports Wuhan China as the epicenter of the COVID-19 virus. However, whether it was natural or made by man, is still being contested.

Moreover, there has been no paucity of scientific explanations regarding the origin of the COVID-19 virus. However, we do not need science to determine its origin. We need to understand the Chinese!

From the beginning (January 2020), it has been my belief that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was not only created by the Chinese government in their Wuhan Laboratory but more balefully, was purposely let out on the world, for the purpose of defeating Donald Trump's reelection. This view is countered that to do so, the Chinese government would infect and kill many of their own people, and therefore preposterous. 

Bo, You Don't Know Diddley!

During the Korean War, Mao’s Chinese Communist Party did not hesitate to spend the lives of 190,000 (Official Chinese Government figure) to 900,000 (CIA Files), with other estimates put at 400,000 people (Michael Hickey, author of The Korean War: The West Confronts Communism). Like Stalin's Soviet Communists, Mao demanded a belief in the price that other men have to pay for the good of their vision. In time, monstrous crimes would be inflicted, not just on their foreign enemies, but on their own citizens. No estimate of the Chinese death rate from COVID-19 can be convincing, given that information is provided by Chinese state media. However, a population of 1.39 billion people, and an estimated death rate ratio of 2.97 (Globally), calculates a total COVID-19 death toll in China of 461,279. 

The point is a simple one. In China, life has been and is cheap. I would strongly proffer that Chinese Communist leaders considered 461,279 Chinese citizens' deaths a bargain to stop Donald Trump's reelection.                              

It is possible that in the fullness of time, we will learn the truth. We invariably know a lot about a lot of things our government will not or cannot admit (to). There is a strongly held and valid perception today that institutions such as the Justice Department (DoJ); the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); the Internal Revenue Service (IRS); and the US Judiciary; are all sworn to protect our democracy, have been compromised and no longer conduct themselves under the rule of law. Now, sadly, we can add the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Indeed, "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident" (Arthur Schopenhauer)

All Enemies Foreign and Domestic

Can you hear that whistleblowing?

It’s blowing now for you.

What are you going to do?

Can you hear that whistleblowing?

It’s blowing now for you.

Time has come, and you know what,

what you must do.

So, what are you going to do?

Can you hear that whistleblowing?

It’s blowing now for you.

You need to be ready,

‘cause your country needs you (to).

Can you hear that whistleblowing?

It’s blowing now for you.

You need to be together with

your brothers and sisters in arms;

they’ve brought the fight, 

and now you must answer; 

You can't back down. 

No, you can't back down (now).

Can you hear that whistleblowing?

It’s blowing now for you.

The cold winds are coming,

and you must be true.

Are you?

Are you?

Are you true?

Can you hear that whistleblowing?

It’s blowing now for you.

Are you red, white, and blue?

Hell yes, I’m red, white, and blue,

and you will see my fury,

when the days of reckoning roar.

Now tell me true, 

Can you hear that whistleblowing?

It’s blowing NOW for you!

Hooyah!

L. Scott Schneiderman

Mass Shootings in the United States: Refuting The Pundits

It is arguably a good thing that the left and the “intellectual” establishment rebel so strenuously against Donald Trump. In this way, their sensational objections, and even violent acts, only serve to question their motives in any policy debate. Intellectual opinion at best, is flawed by political concerns, i.e., “where you stand is where you sit;” but is nugatory when serving an ideological master.

There is much to condemn as to the opinions and debate of the recent mass shootings[1] in El Paso,[2] Texas, Dayton, Ohio,[3] and Chicago, Illinois,[4] over the August 2-4, 2019 weekend, in the United States. The Democratic Party’s and its leftist apparatchiks championing the myopic fixation of gun control, averred by all 2020 Democratic candidates for president, and the fatigued assertion that simply denying Americans the “right to bear arms,” will solve America’s gun violence, is a major part of the problem, and as a society, our ability to solve it.

These are the facts.

The El Paso shooter had apparently extreme view on illegal immigration, while the Dayton shooter had extreme left-wing views, and backed Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. And, while the Chicago shooters political views are unknown, one can assume since they are African – American, they would support Democrats and left-wing views.[5]

51% of mass shooters in 2019 were black, 29% were white, and 11% were Latino. Three mass shooters were Asian, two were American Indian and one was Arab. These numbers are if anything vastly understated. As many as half of the mass shootings that took place in 2019 thus far remain unsolved, but they often took place in black areas and claimed black victims.

We are beginning to understand a great deal more about mass shooters.[6] However, and this is important, it will not be through ideological biased opinion research (polling). Anecdotal, cherry-picked data, generalizations, straw man and Aunt Sally, and presenting complex issues in terms of two inherently opposite sides (firearm ownership or banning the private ownership of firearms), et cetera, arguments are insufficient in finding a solution.

However, a particular worrisome aspect of the left’s point of view is their attempt to link discussion of mass shootings and the immigration issue; and the fallacious allegations alleged by President Trump’s enemies that his “rhetoric” has caused the horrific mass shootings recently experienced in this country. Hence, it is proffered that the Trump Administration’s objection to illegal immigration is the root of the problem of mass shooting in the US today.

What the majority of Americans oppose, and what President Trump has given voice to, is not immigration, but illegal immigration. President Trump’s verbal opposition to illegal immigration is not inflammatory, even though it is portrayed as such by those who oppose his viewpoint on the matter. For example, A pundit[7] who’s description of Americans that support President Trump’s thinking on immigration as “officially sanctioned anti-immigration rhetoric,” is unfortunate, unsound, and unjust. To challenge an argument, or position on a policy, by asserting the manner in which it is presented is unsatisfactory, and regrettably sophomoric.

Do these same pundits agree with Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s (FDR) suspending immigration to Jews in 1939? Or his (FDR’s) executive proclamation 2526 and 2526, in 1941, interning Japanese Americans, and suspending immigration to anyone of German, Japanese, and Italian nationality? There was no substantial criticism of FDR, when he enacted these policies.

Accordingly, it is logical to conclude that if you sit in front of a fireplace, and speak in a professorial mode, with a patrician tone, you can remove people’s rights, and allow the systematic extermination of 6 million people, without objection from the Progressive left and the mainstream media.

On the other hand, President Trump, for the past three years, has been defined by the ideological left and mainstream media, as a racist, white supremacist, fascist, and Nazis. Without any incertitude, they purposefully misrepresent and even falsify his Administration’s policies. Any effort to clarify his position on any issue is met with allegations of racism and unsavory “anti-immigration rhetoric.” While the left advocates lawlessness without challenge!

Moreover, where was mainstream media when Obama’s attorney general, Eric Holder, called me a racist? Where were this same media and liberal pundits lamenting Obama’s, Holder’s, Ms. Clinton’s, et. al., rhetoric and leadership style while the country was being torn apart by identity politics?

The fact is there is no basis for the left’s personal attacks on Mr. Trump’s character and style of leadership. The left’s and mainstream media ad hominem attacks is what bullies do when they can offer no legitimate alternative(s).

Is there any evidence that: President Trump colluded with the Russians to win the 2016 Presidential election; that he has been more mendacious and had more scandals[8] than Barack Obama when he was President; that he was a greater womanizer than Bill Clinton; or a weaker leader than George W. Bush. The short answer is that there is none (evidence). Yet, President Trump is portrayed by the left and mainstream media as the least virtuous and qualified of the lot. There is no question, this contempt for Trump borders on the pathological.

In the last analysis, Americans like guns. Americans understand that gun ownership keeps America free and a democratic country. It’s not the gun that kills – it’s the gun owner. It’s not immigration that Americans object to – it’s illegal immigration. It’s not the immigrant – it’s the illegal immigrant. America’s “right to bear arms,” is the essential reason we are free people today.

G-d Bless America!

---

[1] Definition of a “mass shooter,” is one that shoots and kills four or more people.

[2] El Paso, Texas, August 3, 2019, 22 people killed and 24 others were wounded or injured.

[3] Dayton, Ohio, August 4, 2019, 10 people killed and 27 wounded or injured.

[4] CBS (Chicago), “7 Killed, 46 Wounded In Weekend Shootings, by Mugo Odigwe, August 5, 2019 at 7:31 AM. Seven people were killed and 46 others were wounded in shootings since Friday evening, in Chicago, IL.

[5] 93 percent of African – Americans voted for Barack Obama, in the 2012 Presidential election. In the 2016 Presidential election, Hillary Clinton got 94 percent of the black women vote (4 percent for Donald Trump), and 80 percent of men (13 percent for Mr. Trump).

[6] Op-Ed: “We have studied every mass shooting since 1966. Here’s what we’ve learned about the shooters,” Jillian Peterson and James Densley, Los Angeles Times, Aug. 4, 2019, 9:41 AM

[7] “Dissenting Opinions: On Mass Shootings in the United States,” Geopolitical Futures (GPF), August 8, 2019, Austin, TX.

[8] The following are examples of serious violations of law not investigated by the Obama Administration: Operation “Fast and Furious;” Benghazi terrorist attack and cover-up; IRS’s targeting of conservative entities; Department of Justice’s seizing records of journalists; NSA surveillance of ordinary Americans; Ransom payments to Iran for release of hostages; Bowe Bergdahl’s prisoner exchange; Secret Service prostitution scandal; Hillary Clinton's email scandal; Clinton Foundation scandal; The VA death-list scandal; Solyndra green energy scandal; Administration Officials lying to Congress; Voter Fraud in 2008, 2012 and 2016 Elections; Russia hacking White House computers in 2014; Clinton campaign coordinating with DOJ and Attorney General Loretta Lynch; US Taxpayers Funding Iran Military; Fusion GPS; et cetera.